Skip to content
Market Mix Modeling │ Bottom-Line Analytics
  • Our Solutions
    • BLA Team
  • Our Experience
  • Services
    • Media Mix Modeling
    • Customer & Market Segmentation
    • Demand Forecasting
    • Social Media ROI Measurement
    • Brand Analytics: Radial Landscape Maps
    • CART – Predictive Analytics
    • Structural Equation Modeling
    • Key Drivers Analysis
    • Price Optimisation
  • Our Thinking
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
Site Search
Marketing Mix Modeling │ Bottom-Line Analytics Our Thinking

Hillary & Bernie: Social Analytics for US Political Campaigns

  • March 1, 2016March 1, 2016
  • by admin

Applying innovative social media analytics to political campaigns is an interesting endeavor because it applies the actual words of voters towards understanding political views, engagement and intentions.  The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the value of what can be done and not to make any political pronouncements or specific conclusions.  

In this paper, we will be applying a unique approach to social media analytics and focusing on the Democratic campaigns of Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders. Our first step, here, involves mining hundreds of thousands of social media conversations about these respective campaigns, beginning in mid 2015.

Our approach is unique in that it scores textual conversations using “linguistic rules and language structure”.   This approach divides these comments into many exclusive themes and scores or translates textual conversations on these political candidacies into a metric called the Semantic Engagement Index or SEITM.  The fundamental thesis of this approach goes beyond word counting found in many social analytics approaches.   Here the major thesis presumes that it is not just words that matter but how those words are communicated and the specific context of the conversation.

The approach we have shown here has a special means of not just measuring the volume of comments but also the level of emotion linked to each candidate and the level of expressed or inferred commitment.  Based on the higher levels of these latter two elements, Sanders overall SEITM rating crossed and exceeded Hillary’s in December 2015, as shown below.

SEITM Positive/Negative Scores

Picture2

When we decompose the scores across tonality or sentiment-types, we see that Hillary has significantly more negative engagement than Bernie.

Net SEITM Scores by Candidate

Picture3

Because our method can score the level of positive emotion and inferred commitment behind a candidate, we see an interesting contrast between Hillary and Bernie.   While Hillary still leads in the volume of comments, a much larger proportion of Bernie’s supporters show more positive emotion and commitment behind their candidate.

Picture4

 

Likewise, for each candidate, we can decompose their SEITM scores into specific content or reasons behind their supporter’s engagement towards their candidate.  As shown below, Hillary’s overall engagement is trended below and we see the negative driver of “truthfulness” driving much of her overall SEITM or engagement decline.

Picture5

A key question or issue with respect to the SEITM metric and approach shown here, is how well can it predict outcomes, below, we show how well the SEITM actually fits a historical composite of 12 different political polls.   The answer seems to be quite promising and perhaps we could say that while it might not be perfect, could it be any worse than current political polling in predicting outcomes?

If we look at Bernie’s data, we could also say that his momentum is such he could become the leader in voter preference sometime this summer.

Picture6

Social Analytics and Political Intelligence

Social media analytics, when applied correctly, can generate deep and valuable insights into various political candidates and campaigns.   In this focused example, we find that, while Hillary Clinton has an advantage in numbers (of comments), she shows vulnerabilities on several elements, including more overall negatives, less commitment and positive emotional connections.  Some of these negatives are being driven by some perceived issues with “truthfulness”.

The Elusive Measurement Dilemma of Sports Sponsorship ROI
Our Recent Webinar on Measuring Sports Sponsorship ROI
admin

admin@e-intellisense.com

Related articles

Marketing Mix Modeling │ Bottom-Line Analytics
FREE WEBINAR: Monetising the Customer…
Our Recent Webinar on Measuring…
Marketing Mix Modeling │ Bottom-Line Analytics
The Elusive Measurement Dilemma of…
Customer Path-to-Purchase & Structural Equation…
Brand Content Drivers Modeling: Optimizing…
Marketing Mix Modeling │ Bottom-Line Analytics
Measurement and the Magic of…
Radial Landscape Maps– A Revolution…
Marketing Mix Modeling │ Bottom-Line Analytics
Are you getting the most…

Meet our Market Mix Modeling and Analytics Team

Learn about the team
  • Our Solutions
    • BLA Team
  • Our Experience
  • Services
    • Media Mix Modeling
    • Customer & Market Segmentation
    • Demand Forecasting
    • Social Media ROI Measurement
    • Brand Analytics: Radial Landscape Maps
    • CART – Predictive Analytics
    • Structural Equation Modeling
    • Key Drivers Analysis
    • Price Optimisation
  • Our Thinking
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us

What People Are Saying

...
- Leonard F. Murphy | Chief Editor & Principal Consultant
GreenBook Research Industry Trends
 
...
Marketing Director, major hotel chain.

Follow us on Social Media

Our European Affiliate

bottomlineanalytics.co.uk

Theme by Colorlib Powered by WordPress